The film "Holding Ground" was a very intriguing piece. It chronicled the impact of a community initiative, from the days proceeding its inception, to present day. Further research on DSNI's website allows you to check out all of their current programs, as well as plans for the future.
The film itself taught me a few things about community organizing. First, and most profound, was the sheer amount of people willing and interested in the causes DSNI was fighting for. While this seems like an asinine statement, being that "neighborhood initiative" is part of the agencies title, however it was still refreshing to see. While one would assume that a community so beat down and isolated, powerless, would have the resiliency to fight for what they thought was the betterment of the community. It was also refreshing to hear peoples values on the importance of a healthy community. I think the common stereotype of impoverished communities is that they are full of people who do not care about the community. For too long, there has been a message sent to the public that claimed "these people are trashing their own community" This documentary however showed that that message is wrong. In this case, most certainly, (and I would generalize to most) the community had been beaten down by the system. A combination of factors gelled together lead to a community in peril. With most of the middle to upper-class society members moving out, the city was left abandoned. Without these individuals stimulating growth, the community plummeted.
Hearing the politicians admit their mistakes in this documentary was eye-lifting. They admitted to not having the best interest of the community in mind, or at least that they were terribly misguided in thinking that there plans would work for the community. The documentary showed that the most important part of any initiative, is that it is either created, or at least consulted on, by the community. Too often the people in control make decisions that they feel will be, "in the people's best interest". When in reality, they cannot understand what would be the best for them, because they are not a part of the community. Something that I read recently, and have heard numerous times, "The path to hell is paved with good intentions" and this rings true yet again in this situation. It is extremely fortunate that there was a small group of people who decided something needed to be done.
Friday, February 24, 2012
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Roadblocks
FACING CONFLICT
While one could hope that this would not be an issue, it almost always will be. Whether it is opposition from other agencies, political leaders, or some other members of the community, conflict is bound to arise in almost all community interventions. (If not we would not have many issues now would we) So vital in dealing with this enormous roadblock is understanding the opposition's perspective. While it may seem as if others oppose simply to make things difficult for us, they have their reasons as well. So the main goal is to figure out what there strongest objections are going to be. The optimal outcome would be to join forces with the opposition, and have the same ideas, but that is not probable in most situations. So while we may disagree with these objections, they need to be taken into consideration, if we can cater to these objections while still achieving our goals, positive change will take place. The other important tenant in facing opposition is making sure your own group is united. In order to successfully overcome adversity, as a group, that group must be free from dissension. Before tackling issues or opponents, groups need to make sure their own internal systems are working together. The idea of community interventions is to bring the community together, a great way to promote that is to lead by example.
MONEY
Money is always going to be a monumental issue in our field of work. Because a huge majority of the work we do is on a non-profit basis, funds are not typically the easiest to come by. Therefore the most important tasks in fighting this roadblock are somewhat simple, devise a plan to acquire funds. These could come from government grants, private donors, or community partnerships. While this is somewhat of a given, another important task that falls into this category is assuring that the message lives on, even after the program disappears. The way I interpret this effort is to use the initial and available funds, to assure that you are making a long lasting effect on the target population. Making sure the message lives on even after funding, is most important.
HOW TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM
While this seemingly is what our jobs are supposed to be, to solve problems, sometimes solutions are not as easy as they seem. It takes serious planning and evaluation to build a successful intervention, especially when the funds are short. Sometimes you may only have one opportunity to make a lasting change in a community, you may not have the benefit of trial and error. So proper planning is necessary, from a detailed business plan, to a structural outline of goals and objectives, it is impossible to "wing-it" when making change of this magnitude. The other important aspect of this is to get as much community involvement as possible. While we are the professionals, the community knows best what the issue is, and how it could be best tackled.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Change Agents
Introduction
While my
early life was riddled with neglect and struggle, I was lucky enough to be
taken in by a nice family, in a beautiful quiet town, where I was provided with
all the necessities to grow and prosper. I grew up in a white, conservative,
middle class family. While early on, political issues were not something that
was discussed very much, lately it is among the most frequent topics shared.
Political or social activism, in my family, is viewed as an extremely radical
idea.
As the time
has passed however, I have generated my own beliefs. I would still say I am
somewhat conservative, however not to the extent of my parents, which upsets
them. While I am forever grateful and in debt to my Aunt and Uncle for their
sacrifices, I simply oppose some of their radically conservative beliefs, and
there is nothing wrong with that. People can coexist having different beliefs
and opinions. What I am getting at however, is that I am just now discovering
what it is that I am passionate about, which I will get into later. As a way to
gain some perspective, I decided to read many of Tim Wise’s pieces on white
privilege.
Tim Wise
Tim Wise is
a middle aged, white male of southern decent. Typically, anti-racist activist
does not jump to mind as a trait of this profile, but that is just what Tim
Wise is. Tim Wise holds an extremely powerful opinion about how a good portion
of America still harbors feelings of racism. While this claim could turn heads
and result in swift denial, as it did with me when I read it, however Wise’s
words are revealing. He explained two types of racism, and what their impacts
could be on the country. Of course, the immediate type of racism that jumps to
mind is white supremacists, the Klu Klux Klan and many other groups like it. It
is very easy to oppose these views. Their thoughts are so radical, that the
courage to stand up to them is almost natural. This is what I think turns all
of our heads, because we do not agree with this type of person, we are secure
in thinking that there is no way we are racist. Then Wise explained another
type, a type that, maybe unknowingly, follows along with a racist system.
Without standing up and fighting to change that system, we are just
collaborating with it, participating. In his Wise’s own words; “The second type
is like an invisible gas: you don’t know it’s there until you’ve been lulled
unconscious by it.” (Cook, 2009)
Wise possesses a very strong
personality which enhances his ability to catch the reader. His bold words,
grabbed me instantly, he uses wit and shocking statistics to back his points.
In a piece of his, he attacked white suburban societies for continuing to hold
themselves as a microcosm of America. He used the tragedy of school shooting,
to bring to light the skewed perspective and denial of a portion of middle
class, white Americans. The way he explained the issue, was that these
communities are so sure that crime and violence are a trait of minorities, that
they cannot believe it could happen in there isolated all-white towns. In fact,
they have it completely backwards. Wise points out several statistics opposing
this blind assumption, brining to light the fact that white kids are much more
likely to use cocaine, crack, heroin, and LSD. Wise goes as far to point out; “there are more white high
school students who have used crystal methamphetamine (the most addictive drug on
the streets) than there are Black students who smoke cigarettes.” (2001).
Because these “All-American” towns believe minorities are the main catalysts of
this behavior, they ignore the dysfunction in their own backyards. Wise
warns: “unless you address the emptiness,
pain, isolation and lack of hope felt by children of color and the poor, then
don’t be shocked when the support systems aren’t there for your kids either.”
(2001)
Wise is a renowned scholar, author, and educator. He
spends his energy traveling the country and abroad, speaking and teaching about
racism. His teachings touch all of racism, from issues in education and
religion, to politics and labor; he brings to light the issues in these
systems. Perhaps the most important thing he is doing however is bringing
awareness to white privilege. There are many advantages that white people, who
without being told, may never realize it. It is the idea that simply having
pale skin in our society, entitles you to certain advantages over minorities.
Whether or not people want to believe it, it exists. Wise points out statistics
in the justice system, labor force, education, housing and so on (2001). Wise
has spoken at hundreds of colleges and high schools, has taught professionals
about antiracism all over the country, and has written and published five books
(Cook, 2009). The true scope of his impact cannot be measured. It is impossible
to know how many people he has inspired, and how many people that person will
inspire. With a brash attitude, witty sense of humor, and remarkable
intelligence, Wise has inspired me. While the issues I feel most passionately
about are in a different area, one can only strive to match the passion that he
feels for ending racism.
David Oaks and My Passion
David Oaks is the Executive
Director of MindFreedom International, an International human rights activist
group, with its main concern on psychiatric abuse. David Oaks is a psychiatric
survivor, during college he was hospitalized on numerous occasions and
diagnosed schizophrenic and manic depressive. During one of these
hospitalizations a doctor told David he would have to me on powerful
psychotropic medication for the rest of his life. David has since lived without
medication for 35 years. (Mindfreedom.org, n.d.)
Experiencing firsthand, the flaws of
the mental health care system, David set out to make change. Since graduating
college, David has made it his mission to reform the mental health care system.
As one of the founders of MFI, David has played the leading role in ending the
psychiatric abuse that runs rampant in the current heath care systems. For
years providers, and even states, have mandated psychotropic medicine on
mentally ill people, against their will. While good intentions they may have
been in the beginning, the public is not being served. They are handed a bag of
pills, and sent on their way. In even worse occasions, symptoms and dosages are
experimented on these clients. This is where our passions are linked. While
David’s path was through firsthand experience, survival and maltreatment, mine
has been forged by eyewitness account. I have lived in a family that has seen undiagnosed
mental health issues result in serious substance abuse issues, which has peaked
my interest in the subject, but more so it is my work experience in child
welfare.
During my employment at a
residential home, I began to see how powerful medications were altering these
children. With no real advocate, these children were more or less being
experimented on; if one dosage were too low, they would kick it up, if that
same dosage had a certain side effect, they would add another med to deal with
that, all totaling cocktails of upwards of ten pills. I remember thinking,
“this is not right”. As a 19 year-old kid, taking my first full-time job, I did
not have the knowledge or courage to question the authority. The doctors made
the decisions and we, the support staff, dealt with the children. Children in
the system are sometimes not fortunate enough to have a responsible parent
looking after them. This was never more painfully evident than in my current
placement within a small adoption agency. Particularly with one child, she had
a medical history that would be daunting had it belonged to an elderly person,
never mind a 10 year-old girl. Thankfully our agency intervened and advocated
for this child, demanding a review. Over medication of children is a huge
issue, even more dangerous when dealing with children without parents.
Learning, Leadership, and Lasting Impressions
Child
neglect and abuse is by far the issue that I am most passionate about. While neither
of these agents particularly touches on these issues specifically, much can be
taken from their approaches. Wise and I have similarities in our personalities;
however what I can take from his approach is to boast this personality. I have
a tendency to be bold and brash in my personal life, however, much more
reserved professionally. He has shown that these traits can be a valuable asset
in influencing others, it worked on me. The most important piece to have,
however, is a vast knowledge of the scope of the issue. The impression taken
from Wise, is that he knows all about the issue, how effects not only the
oppressed individuals, but also all other people, and their perspectives on it.
This is now something I believe is vital in reaching out to as many people as
possible.
Oaks on the
other hand, while bold and passionate in his convictions, has taught me more
about the importance of organizing. Oaks brings together groups of survivors to
protest agencies and lawmakers, and also to support agencies and lawmakers. The
way he captivates and convinces is with eye opening truths, with rawness and
purity. He has organized sit-ins and hunger strikes in order to challenge the
American Psychiatric Association and their policies. (Davis, 2003). It takes
tremendous courage to challenge the authority and that is something I did not
possess in the past.
This is the
only leadership quality lacking in my skill set. As has been the case with many
of my recent assignments, my eyes have been opened to the importance of courage
and almost fearlessness. I have always been taught to please as many sides as
possible, without generating any confrontation, which is not entirely possible
in this work. My style is typically to be a leader by example, hard work and
dedication go a long way in inspiring people to do the same. I care very deeply
for the well being of children, specifically children dealing with poverty and
neglect. This is where I hope my impact will be felt.
While I
feel I have all of the qualities it will take to change at least a small part
of the problems affecting communities and systems, developing the courage to
fight for them openly on a larger scale is what I am in the process of doing
now. When thinking broadly about what I want to do with my career as a social
worker, it has always been about helping individuals one at a time, improving
their lives and those around them. In doing this I have always settled for
doing as much as I could, or was allowed to do. What these activists are
teaching me however, is that the greatest change needs to happen systemically. My
biggest question to movements like this has always been; “why’. Why fight so hard
when the odds are completely stacked and the goal is unachievable? Reading one of
Wise’s pieces, this question was answered with a letter he received from the archbishop
of South Africa, thanking him for his efforts, which stated: “You do not do the
things you do because others will necessarily join you in the doing of them,
nor because they will ultimately prove successful. You do the things you do
because the things you are doing are right.” (Wise, 1999). I can only hope that
when I am finished with my career, I will have fought for causes that I knew were
right, regardless of their prospects of victory.
References
Barrett, R., & Munro, N.
(2007). Paved With Good Intentions. National Journal, 39(17),
60-62.
Blackburn, G., & Wise, T.
(2009). ADDRESSING White Privilege IN INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS. Independent
School, 68(3), 114-120.
Cook, David
(July 2009). "By The Color Of Their Skin: Tim Wise On The Myth Of A Postracial
America". The Sun (403), http://www.thesunmagazine.org/issues/403/by_the_color_of_their_skin
Davis,
D. (2003). LA Times Sunday Magazine. Losing the Mind:David Oaks and Others
in the 'Mad Pride' Movement Believe Drugs Are Being Overused in Treating Mental
Illness, and They Want the Abuse to Stop. Retrieved February 11, 2012, http://www.mindfreedom.org/campaign/media/mf/los-angeles-times-david-oaks-mad-pride
Mindfreedom.org.
(n.d.). About David W. Oaks, MindFreedom
International Executive Director Retrieved
February 10, 2012, from Mindfreedom.org: http://www.mindfreedom.org/about-us/david-w-oaks/brief-bio-oaks
Wise, T. (2001). School Shootings and White Denial. Multicultural
Perspectives, 3(4), 3-4.
Wise, T. (1999). The Threat of a Good Example. Social
Justice, 26(2), 182-184.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
A Rebel: Saul Alinsky
I must admit, before this assignment I had never heard of Saul Alinsky. This documentary, surprisingly, really pulled me in. I will admit that I typically fall on the conservative side of things. Instantly, the way the narrator described Alisnky and they way people viewed him, I thought politics were going to be the main focus of the documentary, which would have turned me off to it. However the message and theme of the documentary was less about politics and much more about community, which I really enjoyed.
Quick Summary
Saul Alinsky was born on the west side of Chicago in 1909. Growing up in the city, Alinsky lived through some of the hardest times of the Great Depression. He graduated with a degree in criminology, however believed that he could make a much greater impact working with communities. This decision was proceeded by somewhat of an undercover operation. In order to learn more about gang activity, Alinsky entrenched himself within the mafia in Chicago. While there he realized that not just gang activity, but crime in general, was all a product of poverty and powerlessness. From here he shifted his focus to strengthening communities. The documentary outlines his early works with The Back of the Yard Neighborhood Council, The Woodlawn Organization, and FIGHT. The last half of the documentary shows the footprint that Alinsky left. Through his thoughts and ideas, as well the teachings that he founded, communities are standing up for what is rightfully theirs.
Philosophy and Technique
Early on in the documentary, they alluded to Alinsky's work with both the Back of the Yard Neighborhood and The Woodlawn Organization. These two organizations were similar in their make up and approach. He devised a plan to add together all types of people people from the community, regardless of there beliefs. The common belief that they had, was that the community deserved the power. From here Alinsky just had to take a back seat. The passion showed by the community members took off, and the organizations thrived. With the FIGHT organization however, I believe Alinsky's ideas shown through a little stronger. It may have just been the heat of the issue, but the idea that conflict is necessary for progress was never clearer with this movement. Alinsky served as an inspirational figure, to a group that he seemingly would have clashed with. By building up massive amounts of power, he could strategically strike at the heart of these issues. If it were a politician or an organization, acting as a road block to community health, he would devise a plan to disassemble their power. Such actions are bound to take criticism, however, like many folks in the film said, without them, nothing would have changed.
Quotes
The assignment asked for quotes, however there was only one that completely resonated with me. In an effort to stress this I decided to list it by itself. Because throughout the entire film, it was the strongest message I received.
"Change means movement. Movement means friction. Only in the frictionless
vacuum of a nonexistent abstract world can movement or change occur
without that abrasive friction of conflict"
Thoughts
I viewed the film as very moving and inspirational. As I mentioned earlier, I was afraid it was going to end up being too political. However the views discussed were heavily focused on the development of the community. I think it is very important for communities to be heard and supported. The other part I took away from this film is that conflict is a necessary evil. My personality is one that typically shys away from confrontation, so this is something I will continue to be aware of. Like Saul stated, "Change means movement, movement means friction."
#4 Thoughts on Macro Practice
For this assignment, I decided I would try to interview social workers with very different perspectives, this way I would hopefully get very different answers. The social workers I pestered enough to obtain comments from were all withing my field placement at a small, non-profit adoption agency. The first was my direct supervisor, she holds an LICSW, and is the Support Services Manager. She has been a clinician for 15 years. Secondly is a development associate. She obtained her MSW and after 3 years of clinical work in a hospital, decided to switch to development, and has done that for the last 10 years Lastly is Executive Director, she has worked tirelessly for 25 years for several organizations, and holds a strong passion for the entire adoption community.
Macro practice is what shapes the work we do with people. It is activists and advocates that fight for the projects and policies we believe in, which then allows us to do the work we do. It is also work that can have a much broader scope, My work here may help one kid, which in turn ends up helping an entire family system. But community work that touches an entire neighborhood, has the ability to help a much larger system.
Macro practice is very different from clinical practice, it has much more of a formal feel for me. It is a lot about being passionate about your ideas. It has more of a business-like approach, we need to sell the importance and strengths of our ideas, while also supporting its cost-effectiveness unfortunately.
Macro practice is vital in helping to end social issues. The one I happen to be most passionate about is the importance of permanency for children, but there are millions of issues. Macro practice is mostly about advocating for the rights and well-being of our clients. Whether it is with judges, policy makers, or community leaders, supporting the greatest needs of clients in anyway possible. Whether it is developing large scale community trainings for professionals or joining forces with other agencies to advocate for the passing of a bill, macro practice is about making changes that can help on a massive scale.
Question #2 Activities involving macro practice.
It may be stretching it to say this, but the only instance where I think macro practice comes in for me is my role as an instructor during our community trainings. Every year we offer trainings to community providers in which I teach multiple sections.
I perform macro activities on a daily basis. For instance the biggest project we have right now is a summer college prep program, for children in foster care. Due to the fact that children in foster care are so far behind the educational curve, a group of providers, including our agency, are developing a huge program that is aiming to eliminate the educational gap between children in foster care, and the rest of our youth.
Question #3 What percentage of work is Macro practice?
Almost none, for the most part my work has always been with individuals or families. As an agency we advocate for our clients when appropriate bills are being voted on, but I do not usually play a big role in that.
85% of my time is spent on macro practice, the remainder being mostly filled with administrative duties. Most of the time I am meeting with our board members or exchanging emails with other community providers on behalf of our clients or community. I have however built extremely strong bonds with a number of our clients, past and present. So I do still service some clients in a clinical role.
Question #4 What leadership skills does it take?
For me, I think it is very important to be able to look at things from several perspectives. In my work, I have learned, in order to get things accomplished I need to have an idea of what other people were feeling or thinking, what there agendas are. Because without knowing these angles, it makes it much more difficult to achieve the things I would like to achieve for our clients.
Leadership
Question #1 Define Macro Practice
Macro practice is what shapes the work we do with people. It is activists and advocates that fight for the projects and policies we believe in, which then allows us to do the work we do. It is also work that can have a much broader scope, My work here may help one kid, which in turn ends up helping an entire family system. But community work that touches an entire neighborhood, has the ability to help a much larger system.
Macro practice is very different from clinical practice, it has much more of a formal feel for me. It is a lot about being passionate about your ideas. It has more of a business-like approach, we need to sell the importance and strengths of our ideas, while also supporting its cost-effectiveness unfortunately.
Macro practice is vital in helping to end social issues. The one I happen to be most passionate about is the importance of permanency for children, but there are millions of issues. Macro practice is mostly about advocating for the rights and well-being of our clients. Whether it is with judges, policy makers, or community leaders, supporting the greatest needs of clients in anyway possible. Whether it is developing large scale community trainings for professionals or joining forces with other agencies to advocate for the passing of a bill, macro practice is about making changes that can help on a massive scale.
Question #2 Activities involving macro practice.
It may be stretching it to say this, but the only instance where I think macro practice comes in for me is my role as an instructor during our community trainings. Every year we offer trainings to community providers in which I teach multiple sections.
Basically everything I do is macro practice. Some of my biggest responsibilities are fund-raising and event planning. I advocate for not only our clients, but also the programs and services we provide as an agency. Our agency provides vital services to these clients in need, most of which would not be possible without the help of the community and our donors.
I perform macro activities on a daily basis. For instance the biggest project we have right now is a summer college prep program, for children in foster care. Due to the fact that children in foster care are so far behind the educational curve, a group of providers, including our agency, are developing a huge program that is aiming to eliminate the educational gap between children in foster care, and the rest of our youth.
Question #3 What percentage of work is Macro practice?
Almost none, for the most part my work has always been with individuals or families. As an agency we advocate for our clients when appropriate bills are being voted on, but I do not usually play a big role in that.
Pretty much 95% of my work is Macro practice. The only time I am not doing macro work is during our events. Then I am building connections with clients on a micro level.
85% of my time is spent on macro practice, the remainder being mostly filled with administrative duties. Most of the time I am meeting with our board members or exchanging emails with other community providers on behalf of our clients or community. I have however built extremely strong bonds with a number of our clients, past and present. So I do still service some clients in a clinical role.
Question #4 What leadership skills does it take?
A main skill required to be a good macro leader is to have out-spoken passion. Our director has immense passion for our clients and she stops at nothing to display it. This is necessary in order to generate enough backing to make a difference.
Important skill to have in order to macro practice is patience. No matter how often we get turned down, or projects do not live up to expectations, we have to be patient and persistent. If you know that the cause is a good one, and you believe in it, keep going after it.
For me, I think it is very important to be able to look at things from several perspectives. In my work, I have learned, in order to get things accomplished I need to have an idea of what other people were feeling or thinking, what there agendas are. Because without knowing these angles, it makes it much more difficult to achieve the things I would like to achieve for our clients.
Leadership
The most revealing thing for me was the differences in styles of the three individuals I interviewed. The first of them claimed she did not do much macro practice, however knowing her as my direct supervisor, I know that she leads by example. Her passion is easily shown by her dedication to the clients she serves, as well as her service to the mission of their agency. The other revealing thing about my interviews, was the directors striking resemblance to a character Sen (2003) mentioned in our readings. Sen mentioned what she had been taught, where that in choosing a leader, one must find a person that possesses a "Fire in the Belly" (p. 99). These type of people inspire others. This is exactly the vibe the director of this agency gives off., she is relentless in her pursuit of service to her clients.
Sen,
R. (2003). Stir it up: Lessons in
community organizing and advocacy. SF: Chardon Press Series, Jossey-Bass.
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Blog #3 History of Macro Practice
History of Macro Practice
To be perfectly honest, when asked about the history of macro practice, there is not much that pops into my mind immediately. I am a big fan of American History, I enjoy reading and learning about the people and personaliaties of these historic people, however it has never been focused much on policies or social programs. Then when I started to think back, now with a the focus of this assignment, I began to recall some things that could be relevant. The only issue with the recollections from my memory, is there causes were never framed as "social work" to me. Groups like the Black Panthers during the civil rights movement, while there actions were radical they were parallel to the work of macro social workers, social change. While this may be a terrible analogy, for some reason it was the boldest thought that came to mind when I thought about social change. Being that I do not believe The Black Panther Party would exactly fit the assignment, due to the fact that their social programs were overshadowed by crime and violence, I was forced to further research.
Helping out the less fortunate has always been an admirable trait. Regardless of religion, spirituality, race, or ethnicity, it is noble to help the helpless. There is something inside every human being, that urges them assist. I would be willing to bet that even in the cases of those people who decide not to help, they feel guilty and remorseful when they do not. The interesting (and somewhat exhausting) fact about social problems, is they have always been around and sadly probably always will be. Therefor it is hard to exactly pinpoint the first forms of Macro Social Work. The difficult separation, for me, was between charity and social work (I had to make a cut off somewhere). Because charity has been an institution for as long as written history can remember. This charity was usually initiated by religious organizations. Churches have always promoted help for the sick and impoverished. The point where things started to change was when these groups began seeing issues from a different perspective, rather than just feeding the poor they started to think bigger. It was the early writings of people such as Sir Thomas More that sparked change in people's thinking. More's Utopia, described a world free of problems, saved by the generosity and balance of society. More's words traveled across cultures, influencing the masses wherever it was heard, leading to social reform. Under pressure from citizens of the world "Poor Laws" began to become a reality in many countries, even traveling right here to the United States. It was the drafting of these ideas that would go on to inspire social pioneers from Jane Addams (Hull House) to W.E.B. Dubois (NAACP).
I guess what I am trying to get at is that social reform had been evolving since day one. In the beginning, social problems would be identified, then treated. After years of continued struggle, professionals learned that in order to best serve these disadvantaged people, they needed to start being proactive. Rather than sitting around, waiting for problems to arise, they needed to be proactive.
A major issue that has plagued the world, and unfortunately still does, is racism. With a focus on this country, racism has been a piercing social problem since the first slaves landed here in the 1600's. Used as slaves, beaten down and tortured, and to this day, still not viewed as equal in the eyes of some. W.E.B. Dubois, realizing the magnitude of this problem after very intense rioting and lynchings, set out to protect the rights of African Americans. Along with a colleagues Mary White Ovington, Ida B. Wells, and Henry Moskowitz, they founded the NAACP. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People set out to end racial discrimination. Since its inception, the NAACP has played a vital role in the continued social advancement of African-American citizens. Unfortunately there is still work to be done.
I guess what I am trying to get at is that social reform had been evolving since day one. In the beginning, social problems would be identified, then treated. After years of continued struggle, professionals learned that in order to best serve these disadvantaged people, they needed to start being proactive. Rather than sitting around, waiting for problems to arise, they needed to be proactive.
A major issue that has plagued the world, and unfortunately still does, is racism. With a focus on this country, racism has been a piercing social problem since the first slaves landed here in the 1600's. Used as slaves, beaten down and tortured, and to this day, still not viewed as equal in the eyes of some. W.E.B. Dubois, realizing the magnitude of this problem after very intense rioting and lynchings, set out to protect the rights of African Americans. Along with a colleagues Mary White Ovington, Ida B. Wells, and Henry Moskowitz, they founded the NAACP. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People set out to end racial discrimination. Since its inception, the NAACP has played a vital role in the continued social advancement of African-American citizens. Unfortunately there is still work to be done.
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



